The ruling today that nullified Kethi Kilonzo’s registration
as a voter thereby denying her the chance to run for the Makueni senatorial seat
can only be best described as unfair: unfair, not only to that ambitious young Kenyan
girl, but also to the people of Makueni. There is no doubt that Kethi Kilonzo
is the most favorite to the Makueni people. Denying her the chance to run for
the senatorial seat is to deny the Makueni people the chance to make their democratic
choice.
I am not oblivious of the Kenyan supreme law that requires
one to be a registered voter in order to contest for any electoral position. I am
actually a very strict law-abiding citizen of Kenya, just as I am a rights and
democracy loving Kenyan. I love democracy so much that as we approached the
2013 general elections, I could not help but detest the people who advocated
for the elimination of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto from the presidential race
on basis of the fact that they had pending cases at the Hague. Now, the two did
eventually run and true to it, the results showed that these two were the ones
Kenyans wanted for the country’s top jobs.
Now here is a lady who is clearly the Makueni people’s
choice but whose bid is at the verge of being thwarted. And the question begs
to be asked; if the larger Kenyan community was given the chance to choose the
leaders they wanted in the just concluded elections, why should the people of Makueni
be denied the chance to elect Kethi Kilonzo if that is what they want?
Well, rules are important and must be upheld. But even Jesus
said that you cannot leave your donkey to die in a pit just because it’s a Sabbath
Day and it is written “Remember the Sabbath.” Which would be more honorable or
say logically human; to abide by the rule and deny Kethi Kilonzo from running
for the Makueni senatorial seat or bend this rule for the sake of the county’s
population and let them elect the leader they want?
No comments:
Post a Comment